Three Non-Obvious Ways Culture Affects Email

A few days ago I wrote about some less than obvious ways that culture can impact your meetings (Three Non-Obvious Issues in Multicultural Meetings). Since that was so popular here are three equally unexpected ways in which cultural differences can derail an email exchange.

RISKY REMINDERS. Depending on where you come from you might think that sending reminders is a sensible, practical idea, but this is far from universal. In some cultures you would be expected to send a message about something long in advance of the deadline and then to send a reminder later. If you don't send the reminder people might assume that you have changed their mind and that you no longer need what you asked for. In other cultures you should send a single message with your request and then wait. If you send a reminder it might be perceived as rudeness. How do you know what to do? One way is to look at what the other person usually does. Do they send reminders or just a single message? If in doubt ask someone. Remember it is always OK to ask questions.

AWKWARD ATTACHMENTS. Be especially careful when you send emails with attachments to cultures where people are indirect speakers -- most of the world actually. The reason is that if they cannot open the file they will not say anything to avoid embarrassing you. And if you ask if the file is ok you might get a polite yes. I have seen this happen where someone sent PC files to people with UNIX workstations and the responses were odd because the recipients read only the message and not the attachment yet could not say that they had a problem. You can workaround this by asking open questions rather than ones where the answer is yes/no. For example, instead of saying "Can you open .xyz files" you can ask "What software would you use to open ".xyz" files.

DANGEROUS DISTRIBUTION LISTS. You can seriously upset people just by putting their boss or your boss in copy on a message. In strongly hierarchical cultures this is the norm, and to send a message without copying the management would be considered sneaky and somehow not correct. In cultures where hierarchy is less emphasized it is normal to send messages to a single person without copying their boss. In this case when you do copy the boss it will be perceived as an escalation and/or offensive. Again this is an easy one to get right. Just look what the other people do in their messages and do the same.

+


Related posts about intercultural issues:

Why the Office Weasel Can Play a Useful Role in Hierarchical Organizations
Managing Across Cultures Three Non-obvious Issues to Watch For
Three Non-Obvious Ways Culture Affects Email , 
Three Non-Obvious Issues in Multicultural Meetings  
Culture, Innovation and the Curious Case of Pandora Radio.  

 Lectures, Workshops, Coaching on intercultural issues.

 All of these articles are based on lectures, workshops and webinars on intercultural communication and management created by the author. For more information about these visit andrewhennigan.com contact me by mail at speaker@andrewhennigan.com or call 0046 730 894 475.



Comments

Kristen Sukalac said…
When working at a global trade association, we had e-mail issues with a president from a highly hierarchical culture. We (senior management) thought we had things covered by sending e-mails that copied our boss. But he still interpreted this as something that had not gone through the Director General. So for the duration of his presidency, we had to prepare all his e-mails to be sent by the DG's assistant in his name.
07 November, 2011
Andrew Hennigan said…
Thanks for the nice example Kristen. People from less hierarchical cultures often have problems understanding this kind of issue.
07 November, 2011
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Dear Best Regards: How to Start and End Your Emails

Image
Last year I wrote that to make your email more effective you should put meaningful content into the subject line, keep your messages short and consider other channels (see Three Timesaving Tips for Email ). I also wrote some guidelines about common culture problems when email crosses borders (see Three Non-Obvious Ways Culture Affects Email ). But there is one other question about international email that comes up regularly in workshops: how should you start and finish? Do I use "Dear", "Hi",or "Hello" to start with? What do I do if I don't know if the person I am writing to is a man or a woman? "What is the difference between "Best regards  and "Warm regards"? This is a question that puzzles many people and a while ago it stressed me, too. But the answers to these questions are perhaps easier than you imagine. DEAR MR/MRS WHATEVER . First of all, at the start of a mail you probably have some sort of salutation. How do you kn
Read more

Reverting to Emails: Confusion and the Indian English Language

Image
In workshops about global email many people focus on their issues communicating with colleagues in India. Partly this is related to some deeper cultural differences that lead to misunderstandings. But many problems are also caused by the different ways in which Indian people use English. There are some "English" words that you will probably only hear in India, like " stepney ", their word for a spare wheel. A hundred years ago this term was coined in the UK and was exported to India where it survived. Back home only a few antique vehicle enthusiasts have any idea what it means. There are also many English expressions that are peculiar to India, like "What is your good name?". But in both cases an English speaker from elsewhere would just see an unfamiliar expression and either ask what it means or google it. Most problems are caused by another kind of difference: where a standard US or UK English word is used but with a different meaning. Recently s
Read more

TED’s Magical Red Carpet

Image
Watch any TED(x) video or, better still, attend a live event, and you will probably notice that speakers stand in the middle of a circular red carpet. This choice is not just a question of aesthetics. That red carpet actually plays a key role in the success of the TED format. Having the speaker stand in the middle of a red carpet has several important consequences, leading the speaker to follow best practices that they might not be aware of. No script or notes . Since there is no table, lectern or other furniture within reach, the speaker cannot easily read from a script. This forces them to deliver their talk from memory, which is much more compelling because few people can read from a script and make it sound natural. And no matter how good you are at reading, the audience can see that your eyes are scanning the text and this breaks the magical connection with their minds. Encouraging people to speak from memory pushes them to make a much better talk than they might ot
Read more