Unintended Consequences: Why Plain Packaging for Cigarettes Didn't Work
Plain packaging for cigarettes
is widely seen as a way to reduce the number of people smoking, but the notion that selling cigarettes in uniform,
logo-free dull-green packages covered in health warnings will deter smokers
fails to take into account both human nature and the way brands work. I wrote about this two years ago in Why Plain Packaging for Cigarettes is Unlikely to Work but in a way I was wrong. Not only did it not deter smokers it actually had the opposite effect, but for reasons that nobody seems to have predicted.
Advocates of plain packaging
believe that smokers and aspiring smokers will be repelled by unattractive
plain packages. This doesn't happen. Nobody smokes because the
packages are cool; people start smoking because they believe that smoking is
cool and they continue because they are addicted. Existing legislation also
ensures that people are not going to pick up a packet of cigarettes from a
supermarket shelf because it looks stylish; they ask for a brand they have
already chosen and they are influenced more by the image of the brand rather
than the packaging.
Even if smokers were discouraged
by ugly packaging it would not take long for people to realize that you could
easily slip an attractive sleeve around the package, making the retail package
more like a refill. Regulating these covers would be very complex if at all
possible. The move might also lead to the emergence of a market for third party
covers, like for smartphones. It could even prompt the return of elegant,
Bertie-Wooster-style cigarette cases. This has not happened in practice,
confirming suspicions that smokers are not at all repelled by the new packages.
What has actually happened in
Australia is that after 18 months of plain packaging smoking has not declined; it even increased slightly as reported in this article in The Australian. As many expected, smokers were not deterred by the
packages but there was one effect that nobody predicted: smokers switched to
cheaper brands, so they could either spend less or smoke more for the same
price.
What is happening here is that
packages used to be important to signal to other people which brand you smoked,
and many people clearly chose a more expensive brand merely as a social
display. Once all the packages are the same this no longer works so people
simply buy the cheapest they can find. This might hurt the tobacco companies
slightly, since it reduces sales of premium brands, but it does not do any good
for the smokers.
Reducing the number of people
smoking and, most importantly, the number of young people starting is a key
public health goal, but we need to find some other solution than plain
packaging, which can never be more than a small part of the answer.
Lectures, Workshops, Coaching and Writing
For lectures, workshops, one-to-one coaching and writing on this and other communication topics you cam contact me through my website http://andrewhennigan.com, by email at conseil@andrewhennigan.com or by phone on 0046 730 894 475 in Sweden or 0033 6 79 61 42 81 in France.
Comments